PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXCM vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXCM vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.48% return.


DXCM

1D
-0.25%
1M
22.04%
YTD
9.37%
6M
11.25%
1Y
-15.21%
3Y*
-16.49%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
15.53%

SPUS

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.95%
YTD
15.48%
6M
14.72%
1Y
39.61%
3Y*
24.81%
5Y*
17.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXCM vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
9.37%-14.66%-37.33%9.58%-15.64%45.23%69.02%0.04%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.48%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DXCM and SPUS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.45

The correlation between DXCM and SPUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXCM vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXCM
DXCM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DXCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXCM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DXCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXCM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXCM vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXCMSPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.48

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

3.73

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

16.06

-16.73

DXCM vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXCM Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXCM and SPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXCMSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

2.81

-3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.91

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.91

-0.61

Drawdowns

DXCM vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and SPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXCMSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.61%

-30.80%

-63.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.75%

-10.66%

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.95%

-22.82%

-38.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.32%

-28.06%

-38.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.42%

-1.14%

-54.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-6.21%

-29.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.66%

2.47%

+20.19%

Volatility

DXCM vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 4.00%. This indicates that DXCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXCMSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.13%

4.00%

+9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.58%

10.85%

+13.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.23%

14.16%

+26.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.91%

19.22%

+27.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.42%

21.28%

+27.14%

Dividends

DXCM vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXCM and SPUS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXCM has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs SPUS's -30.80%.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXCM and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer