DXCM vs. SPUS
DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) is a stock, while SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Over the past 5 years, DXCM returned -8.30%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for SPUS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXCM vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 9.91% return.
DXCM
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- -20.35%
- 3Y*
- -18.05%
- 5Y*
- -8.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DXCM vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 5.09% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 0.65% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 9.91% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXCM and SPUS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DXCM and SPUS has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXCM vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
DXCM
SPUS
DXCM vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXCM | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.78 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 10.96 | -11.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXCM vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXCM | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.61% | -30.80% | -63.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.75% | -10.66% | -28.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.95% | -22.82% | -38.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -28.06% | -38.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.16% | -5.91% | -51.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.04% | -6.19% | -29.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.02% | 2.70% | +20.32% |
Volatility
DXCM vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 6.79%. This indicates that DXCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXCM | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.93% | 6.79% | +4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.91% | 12.24% | +13.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.11% | 15.24% | +25.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.06% | 19.41% | +27.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.44% | 21.33% | +27.11% |
Dividends
DXCM vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXCM and SPUS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXCM has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to SPUS (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXCM and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer