PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWUS vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWUS vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 9.49% return.


DWUS

1D
-2.38%
1M
-5.23%
6M
6.03%
YTD
8.01%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*

WNTR

1D
2.96%
1M
17.94%
6M
21.62%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
127.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and WNTR is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWUS vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS
DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWUSWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.35

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.02

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

7.72

-3.07

DWUS vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWUSWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-42.65%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-42.65%

+30.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.43%

-10.67%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-20.46%

+13.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

16.63%

-13.13%

Volatility

DWUS vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) is 9.56%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.89%. This indicates that DWUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWUSWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

17.89%

-8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

47.05%

-30.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

53.81%

-34.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

53.49%

-34.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

53.49%

-30.98%

DWUS vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWUS vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than WNTR's 106.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.18%0.29%0.89%0.35%0.08%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
106.86%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWUS and WNTR have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.89%) compared to DWUS (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 127.90% vs 16.22% for DWUS. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, DWUS has been the lower-risk option at 9.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 127.90% return vs 16.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 106.86%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.

DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWUS and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer