PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWUS vs. EAOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DWUS vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DWUS vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
-5.24%12.75%20.26%20.62%-17.89%20.21%26.80%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
-0.94%15.59%10.69%14.96%-16.66%10.51%15.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a -5.24% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's -0.94% return.


DWUS

1D
0.89%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
-5.24%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
9.65%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*

EAOR

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
0.91%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DWUS vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DWUS vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS
DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWUSEAORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

1.30

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

1.89

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.27

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.88

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.07

8.25

-5.18

DWUS vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and EAOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWUSEAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.30

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.52

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.75

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and EAOR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DWUS vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than EAOR's 2.47% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.18%0.29%0.89%0.35%0.08%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.47%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and EAOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DWUSEAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-22.91%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-7.80%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-22.91%

-3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.43%

-4.26%

-4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-5.18%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

1.77%

+1.65%

Volatility

DWUS vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 4.20%. This indicates that DWUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DWUSEAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

4.20%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

6.61%

+6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.30%

11.10%

+9.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

10.46%

+8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

10.41%

+11.60%