DWSH vs. SFLO
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SFLO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. DWSH is actively managed, while SFLO is passively managed. Over the past year, DWSH returned -10.40% vs 32.02% for SFLO. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SFLO.
Performance
DWSH vs. SFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than SFLO's 13.58% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
SFLO
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH vs. SFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 0.85% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -0.58% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 13.58% | 11.88% | 6.54% | -0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and SFLO is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023 | -0.81 |
The correlation between DWSH and SFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWSH vs. SFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWSH
SFLO
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
DWSH
-
SFLO
Basic Materials
DWSH
SFLO
Energy
DWSH
SFLO
Communication Services
DWSH
SFLO
Real Estate
DWSH
SFLO
Consumer Defensive
DWSH
SFLO
Financial Services
DWSH
SFLO
Healthcare
DWSH
SFLO
Consumer Cyclical
DWSH
SFLO
Industrials
DWSH
SFLO
Technology
DWSH
SFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. SFLO — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
SFLO
DWSH vs. SFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWSH | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.32 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 4.12 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 13.73 | -14.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWSH | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 1.87 | -2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.64 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. SFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than SFLO's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and SFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -26.63% | -56.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -7.80% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.25% | -2.70% | -78.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -4.33% | -59.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 2.34% | +9.48% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. SFLO - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) at 5.26%. This indicates that DWSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 5.26% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 11.45% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 17.30% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 20.55% | +5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 20.55% | +10.67% |
DWSH vs. SFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. SFLO - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than SFLO's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.26% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.85% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and SFLO have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to SFLO (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs SFLO's -26.63%.
On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 32.02% vs -10.40% for DWSH. On fees, SFLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SFLO has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 32.02% return vs -10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.85% for SFLO.
DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SFLO is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Victory. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.49% for SFLO.
SFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and SFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer