DWSH vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DWSH returned -6.37% vs 266.72% for MSTZ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -31.90% return.

DWSH

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -2.21%
• 6M: 0.73%
• YTD: -4.04%
• 1Y: -6.37%
• 3Y*: -2.81%
• 5Y*: -2.43%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -11.25%
• 1M: 29.92%
• 6M: -7.52%
• YTD: -31.90%
• 1Y: 266.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF	-4.04%	-2.57%	2.35%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-31.90%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between DWSH and MSTZ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.29

Return for Risk

DWSH vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWSH

DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 6
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWSH	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	1.81	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.25	2.41	-2.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.31	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	3.16	-3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.75	6.14	-6.89

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWSH and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWSH	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.55%	-99.38%	+15.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.88%	-84.89%	+66.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.16%	-97.68%	+15.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.82%	-94.54%	+30.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.50%	43.66%	-35.16%

Volatility

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 11.00%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWSH	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.00%	57.19%	-46.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.82%	135.18%	-118.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.31%	148.74%	-126.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.36%	171.04%	-144.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.24%	171.04%	-139.80%

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWSH vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF	6.58%	6.31%	6.17%	10.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.14%	0.12%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWSH and MSTZ in my portfolio?

DWSH and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWSH or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to DWSH (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -83.55% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, DWSH or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs -6.37% for DWSH. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 11.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWSH or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs -6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWSH or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWSH or MSTZ?

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between DWSH and MSTZ?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.