PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWM vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWM vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWM achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 10.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DWM having a 9.22% annualized return and RODM not far ahead at 9.31%.


DWM

1D
-1.33%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.15%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
9.22%

RODM

1D
-0.71%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
10.16%
6M
9.75%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWM vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
7.25%34.83%4.15%16.63%-9.04%10.76%-2.33%18.98%-13.53%24.08%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
10.16%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DWM and RODM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.87

The correlation between DWM and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWM vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWM
RODM

Industrials

18.8%
16.7%

Financial Services

18.1%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
6.0%

Healthcare

8.0%
9.0%

Technology

7.5%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
6.4%

Utilities

5.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

4.8%
5.5%

Energy

3.8%
6.3%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.5%

Industrials

DWM
18.8%
RODM
16.7%

Financial Services

DWM
18.1%
RODM
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DWM
9.7%
RODM
6.0%

Healthcare

DWM
8.0%
RODM
9.0%

Technology

DWM
7.5%
RODM
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

DWM
7.1%
RODM
4.0%

Basic Materials

DWM
5.5%
RODM
6.4%

Utilities

DWM
5.2%
RODM
4.8%

Communication Services

DWM
4.8%
RODM
5.5%

Energy

DWM
3.8%
RODM
6.3%

Real Estate

DWM
2.8%
RODM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWM vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWM
DWM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWM vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWMRODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.40

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

13.45

-6.54

DWM vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWM and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWM vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWM drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWM and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.10%

-35.98%

-26.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-7.10%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-10.58%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-28.85%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.82%

-35.98%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-2.16%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.47%

-6.36%

-7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.79%

+1.23%

Volatility

DWM vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.21%. This indicates that DWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.21%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

8.77%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

10.95%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

13.45%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

15.08%

+1.24%

DWM vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWM vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

DWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than RODM's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
2.77%3.06%3.86%4.15%4.36%3.64%2.74%3.46%3.86%2.99%3.43%3.55%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.82%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DWM and RODM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DWM has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to RODM (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWM dropped -62.10% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, RODM leads with 9.31% vs 9.22% for DWM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DWM.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.77% for DWM.

DWM tracks WisdomTree International Equity Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DWM and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWM and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer