DWLD vs. PID
DWLD (Davis Select Worldwide ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. DWLD is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWLD returned 8.09%/yr vs 8.28%/yr for PID. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWLD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
DWLD vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWLD achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than PID's 5.45% return.
DWLD
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
DWLD vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWLD Davis Select Worldwide ETF | 2.89% | 30.43% | 24.34% | 20.62% | -14.20% | -4.03% | 22.73% | 31.28% | -22.28% | 30.10% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.45% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 24.49% | -6.56% | 25.87% | -11.46% | 14.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWLD and PID is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between DWLD and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DWLD vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWLD
PID
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWLD
PID
Financial Services
DWLD
PID
Technology
DWLD
PID
Communication Services
DWLD
PID
Healthcare
DWLD
PID
Consumer Defensive
DWLD
PID
Energy
DWLD
PID
Basic Materials
DWLD
PID
Industrials
DWLD
PID
Real Estate
DWLD
-
PID
Utilities
DWLD
-
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWLD vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
DWLD
PID
DWLD vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWLD | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.66 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 2.46 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.16 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 7.36 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWLD | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.66 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.60 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.27 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
DWLD vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWLD drawdown since its inception was -39.27%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWLD and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWLD | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.27% | -66.34% | +27.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -7.47% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | -13.34% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.75% | -22.97% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -2.19% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -13.04% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 2.18% | +1.08% |
Volatility
DWLD vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that DWLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWLD | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 2.75% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 7.62% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 9.70% | +5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.66% | 13.97% | +6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 17.84% | +3.38% |
DWLD vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWLD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWLD vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
DWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWLD Davis Select Worldwide ETF | 1.52% | 1.56% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 0.75% | 1.03% | 0.24% | 2.27% | 4.11% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWLD and PID have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWLD has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWLD dropped -39.27% vs PID's -66.34%.
On 5-year performance, PID leads with 8.28% vs 8.09% for DWLD. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.28% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DWLD.
PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.52% for DWLD.
They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DWLD and 0.56% for PID.
PID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWLD and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer