PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWLD vs. URTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWLD vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWLD achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 10.16% return.


DWLD

1D
0.27%
1M
4.26%
YTD
4.67%
6M
8.15%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*

URTH

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.65%
YTD
10.16%
6M
10.88%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWLD vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWLD
Davis Select Worldwide ETF
4.67%30.43%24.34%20.62%-14.20%-4.03%22.73%31.28%-22.28%30.10%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
10.16%21.36%18.66%23.95%-17.97%22.27%15.78%28.15%-8.56%20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DWLD and URTH is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017

0.82

The correlation between DWLD and URTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWLD vs. URTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWLD
URTH

Consumer Cyclical

21.4%
9.3%

Financial Services

20.2%
15.8%

Technology

17.4%
28.3%

Communication Services

11.9%
9.3%

Healthcare

11.4%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
5.2%

Energy

5.8%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.3%

Industrials

0.8%
11.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DWLD
21.4%
URTH
9.3%

Financial Services

DWLD
20.2%
URTH
15.8%

Technology

DWLD
17.4%
URTH
28.3%

Communication Services

DWLD
11.9%
URTH
9.3%

Healthcare

DWLD
11.4%
URTH
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

DWLD
7.6%
URTH
5.2%

Energy

DWLD
5.8%
URTH
4.2%

Basic Materials

DWLD
3.5%
URTH
3.3%

Industrials

DWLD
0.8%
URTH
11.3%

Real Estate

DWLD

-

URTH
1.9%

Utilities

DWLD

-

URTH
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWLD vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWLD
DWLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWLD vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWLDURTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

2.17

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

3.02

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.89

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.75

13.11

-5.36

DWLD vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWLD and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWLDURTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.17

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.74

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.73

-0.19

Drawdowns

DWLD vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWLD drawdown since its inception was -39.27%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWLD and URTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWLDURTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.27%

-34.01%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-9.06%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

-16.94%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.75%

-26.05%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-4.37%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

1.99%

+1.27%

Volatility

DWLD vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 3.27%. This indicates that DWLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWLDURTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.27%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

9.42%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

12.05%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

16.19%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

17.27%

+3.94%

DWLD vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWLD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWLD vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

DWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than URTH's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWLD
Davis Select Worldwide ETF
1.49%1.56%1.45%1.23%0.75%1.03%0.24%2.27%4.11%0.20%0.00%0.00%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.35%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWLD and URTH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWLD has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to URTH (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWLD dropped -39.27% vs URTH's -34.01%.

On 5-year performance, URTH leads with 11.86% vs 8.53% for DWLD. On fees, URTH is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, URTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, URTH has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URTH is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DWLD.

DWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.35% for URTH.

They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DWLD and 0.24% for URTH.

URTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWLD and URTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer