DWLD vs. DFIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DWLD (Davis Select Worldwide ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Davis Advisers, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWLD returned 19.74%/yr vs 22.72%/yr for DFIV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWLD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

DWLD vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWLD achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 8.43% return.

DWLD

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: -1.37%
• 6M: -1.56%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 19.74%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: —

DFIV

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 30.90%
• 3Y*: 22.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWLD vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DWLD Davis Select Worldwide ETF	-1.37%	30.43%	24.34%	20.62%	-14.20%	-4.40%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	8.43%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DWLD and DFIV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.75

The correlation between DWLD and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWLD vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWLD	DFIV
Consumer Cyclical	21.2%	10.0%
Financial Services	19.1%	32.4%
Technology	18.5%	3.2%
Communication Services	12.6%	4.3%
Healthcare	11.4%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	4.9%
Energy	4.8%	15.3%
Basic Materials	3.3%	11.4%
Industrials	2.6%	9.8%
Real Estate	-	1.7%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

DWLD vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWLD

DWLD Risk / Return Rank: 31
DWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 30
DWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 34

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 68
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWLD vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWLD	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.17	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.95	-1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.39	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	3.21	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	12.28	-7.52

DWLD vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWLD and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWLD vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWLD drawdown since its inception was -39.27%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWLD and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWLD	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.27%	-25.42%	-13.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.27%	-9.66%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.01%	-14.72%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.78%	-3.78%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-4.45%	-6.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	2.52%	+0.86%

Volatility

DWLD vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

Davis Select Worldwide ETF (DWLD) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 4.96%. This indicates that DWLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWLD	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	4.96%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.50%	11.79%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	14.32%	+0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	16.67%	+4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.19%	16.67%	+4.52%

DWLD vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWLD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWLD vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than DFIV's 2.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.63%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DWLD Davis Select Worldwide ETF	1.58%	1.56%	1.45%	1.23%	0.75%	1.03%	0.24%	2.27%	4.11%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWLD and DFIV in my portfolio?

DWLD and DFIV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWLD or DFIV?

DWLD has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to DFIV (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWLD dropped -39.27% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, DWLD or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 22.72% vs 19.74% for DWLD. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWLD or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 22.72% return vs 19.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWLD or DFIV?

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DWLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWLD or DFIV?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.58% for DWLD.

What is the main difference between DWLD and DFIV?

DWLD is categorized as Global Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DWLD and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.