DWAW vs. YOLO
DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWAW returned 7.23%/yr vs -31.60%/yr for YOLO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for YOLO.
Performance
DWAW vs. YOLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than YOLO's -11.82% return.
DWAW
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
YOLO
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- -11.82%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 48.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- -31.60%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAW vs. YOLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 16.16% | 10.85% | 18.48% | 11.18% | -17.80% | 3.49% | 48.87% | -0.38% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -11.82% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -72.21% | -20.48% | 47.17% | 5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAW and YOLO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019 | 0.43 |
The correlation between DWAW and YOLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DWAW vs. YOLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAW
YOLO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
DWAW
YOLO
-
Financial Services
DWAW
YOLO
Industrials
DWAW
YOLO
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWAW
YOLO
Healthcare
DWAW
YOLO
Communication Services
DWAW
YOLO
-
Basic Materials
DWAW
YOLO
-
Consumer Defensive
DWAW
YOLO
Energy
DWAW
YOLO
-
Utilities
DWAW
YOLO
-
Real Estate
DWAW
YOLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAW vs. YOLO — Risk / Return Rank
DWAW
YOLO
DWAW vs. YOLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAW | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 0.65 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.60 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.19 | +1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 2.23 | +7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAW | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 0.65 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.59 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.48 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
DWAW vs. YOLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum YOLO drawdown of -94.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and YOLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAW | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -94.68% | +63.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -41.09% | +29.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -66.45% | +43.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | -92.47% | +64.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -89.68% | +89.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -68.94% | +57.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 21.83% | -18.98% |
Volatility
DWAW vs. YOLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) is 5.42%, while AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that DWAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YOLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAW | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 12.79% | -7.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 52.52% | -39.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 74.56% | -58.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 53.64% | -34.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 51.36% | -28.95% |
DWAW vs. YOLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than YOLO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAW vs. YOLO - Dividend Comparison
DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 0.66% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAW and YOLO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YOLO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to DWAW (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs YOLO's -94.68%.
On 5-year performance, DWAW leads with 7.23% vs -31.60% for YOLO. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DWAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWAW has performed better with a 7.23% return vs -31.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.
DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.
DWAW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while YOLO is Cannabis. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.75% for YOLO.
DWAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAW and YOLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer