DWAW vs. QWLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DWAW is actively managed, while QWLD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWAW returned 7.35%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for QWLD. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

DWAW vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than QWLD's 9.39% return.

DWAW

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -1.23%
• 6M: 9.45%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 16.07%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.57%

QWLD

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 6.46%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: 11.57%
• ALL TIME*: 10.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	$31.55K	$26.41K	$94.07K
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	$231.12K	$297.84K	$1.04M

DWAW vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	12.39%	10.85%	18.48%	11.18%	-17.80%	3.49%	48.87%	24.93%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	9.39%	17.93%	14.44%	19.59%	-13.30%	21.57%	10.24%	-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAW and QWLD is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2019	0.80

The correlation between DWAW and QWLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAW vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWAW	QWLD
Technology	32.6%	24.9%
Financial Services	18.4%	16.5%
Industrials	10.9%	10.9%
Healthcare	7.7%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	6.3%
Communication Services	6.3%	9.5%
Energy	4.4%	3.4%
Basic Materials	4.3%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	8.1%
Utilities	2.8%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.0%

Return for Risk

DWAW vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWAW

DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 51
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

QWLD

QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 80
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWAW vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWAW	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.93	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.75	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	2.44	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	10.67	-3.90

DWAW vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAW and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWAW vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, roughly equal to the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and QWLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWAW	QWLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.55%	-31.89%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.58%	-7.66%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.91%	-12.40%	-10.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.43%	-22.84%	-5.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.38%	0.00%	-4.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-3.66%	-7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	1.75%	+1.36%

Volatility

DWAW vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that DWAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWAW	QWLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	2.30%	+2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.82%	7.73%	+7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.33%	9.71%	+7.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.27%	13.51%	+5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.46%	15.12%	+9.34%

DWAW vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWAW vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than QWLD's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF	0.68%	0.76%	0.00%	1.70%	0.53%	1.45%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	1.79%	1.85%	1.74%	1.78%	2.02%	1.77%	1.77%	2.13%	2.33%	2.73%	2.22%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWAW and QWLD in my portfolio?

DWAW and QWLD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWAW or QWLD?

DWAW has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

Which ETF is better, DWAW or QWLD?

On 5-year performance, QWLD leads with 10.03% vs 7.35% for DWAW. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWAW or QWLD?

Over the 5-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWAW or QWLD?

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWAW or QWLD?

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.68% for DWAW.

What is the main difference between DWAW and QWLD?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.30% for QWLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.