PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAW vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAW vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 8.94% return.


DWAW

1D
-3.01%
1M
1.62%
YTD
14.00%
6M
13.09%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
8.94%
6M
7.85%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAW vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
14.00%10.85%18.48%11.18%-17.80%3.49%48.87%24.93%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
8.94%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAW and ITOT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2019

0.87

The correlation between DWAW and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAW vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAW
ITOT

Technology

33.0%
37.2%

Financial Services

17.5%
11.4%

Industrials

11.3%
9.1%

Healthcare

7.7%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
9.8%

Communication Services

6.0%
9.8%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.0%

Energy

4.5%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.3%

Utilities

2.8%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.3%

Technology

DWAW
33.0%
ITOT
37.2%

Financial Services

DWAW
17.5%
ITOT
11.4%

Industrials

DWAW
11.3%
ITOT
9.1%

Healthcare

DWAW
7.7%
ITOT
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAW
7.5%
ITOT
9.8%

Communication Services

DWAW
6.0%
ITOT
9.8%

Basic Materials

DWAW
4.5%
ITOT
2.0%

Energy

DWAW
4.5%
ITOT
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

DWAW
3.9%
ITOT
4.3%

Utilities

DWAW
2.8%
ITOT
2.1%

Real Estate

DWAW
1.4%
ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAW vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAW
DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAW vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWAWITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.74

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

12.14

-3.61

DWAW vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAW and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAW vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWAWITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.55%

-55.20%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-8.90%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-19.44%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-25.36%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-2.79%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-6.96%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.00%

+0.90%

Volatility

DWAW vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 4.96%. This indicates that DWAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWAWITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

4.96%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

10.06%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

12.85%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

17.46%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

18.28%

+6.29%

DWAW vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAW vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than ITOT's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
0.67%0.76%0.00%1.70%0.53%1.45%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAW and ITOT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAW has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to ITOT (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 11.93% vs 7.55% for DWAW. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.67% for DWAW.

DWAW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAW and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer