DWAW vs. FMTM
DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DWAW returned 27.21% vs 63.62% for FMTM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
DWAW vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.
DWAW
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAW vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 16.16% | 17.75% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAW and FMTM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DWAW and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAW vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
DWAW
FMTM
DWAW vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAW | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 2.80 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 3.43 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 5.28 | -2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 20.62 | -11.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAW | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.80 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 2.38 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
DWAW vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAW | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -12.12% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -12.12% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -1.89% | -9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.10% | -0.25% |
Volatility
DWAW vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) is 5.42%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that DWAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAW | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 6.52% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 17.83% | -4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 22.82% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 22.94% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 22.94% | -0.53% |
DWAW vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAW vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 0.66% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.16% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAW and FMTM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to DWAW (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs FMTM's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 27.21% for DWAW. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DWAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 27.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.
DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
DWAW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.45% for FMTM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAW and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer