PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAW vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DWAW vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DWAW vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
-1.65%10.85%18.48%11.18%-17.80%3.49%48.87%-0.38%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
6.10%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%-0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 6.10% return.


DWAW

1D
1.23%
1M
-5.87%
YTD
-1.65%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*

BIBL

1D
1.12%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
6.10%
6M
7.52%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DWAW vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DWAW vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAW
DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAW vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWAWBIBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.25

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.78

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.84

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.57

8.69

-3.12

DWAW vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAW Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAW and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWAWBIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.25

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.43

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between DWAW and BIBL is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DWAW vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than BIBL's 1.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
0.78%0.76%0.00%1.70%0.53%1.45%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.11%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%

Drawdowns

DWAW vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and BIBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DWAWBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.55%

-36.12%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-13.93%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-30.85%

+2.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-4.96%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-7.17%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.95%

+0.34%

Volatility

DWAW vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 6.82%. This indicates that DWAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DWAWBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

6.82%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

12.28%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.17%

20.39%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

19.44%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

21.15%

+1.35%