DWAS vs. XMVM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - DWAS tracks the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWAS returned 12.36%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for XMVM. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.

Performance

DWAS vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DWAS having a 18.89% return and XMVM slightly lower at 18.13%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DWAS having a 12.36% annualized return and XMVM not far behind at 12.28%.

DWAS

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: -4.52%
• 6M: 13.09%
• YTD: 18.89%
• 1Y: 38.93%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 12.36%
• ALL TIME*: 11.83%

XMVM

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 5.73%
• 6M: 13.53%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 1Y: 39.09%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 12.28%
• ALL TIME*: 9.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF	$1.30M	$3.37M	$2.26M
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.19M	$2.07M	$1.98M

DWAS vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF	18.89%	6.09%	9.81%	16.88%	-18.51%	19.75%	32.32%	31.39%	-10.68%	20.84%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	18.13%	18.46%	11.73%	16.31%	-8.21%	35.15%	5.68%	30.38%	-9.62%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and XMVM is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between DWAS and XMVM has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DWAS vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWAS	XMVM
Healthcare	28.5%	2.5%
Technology	20.9%	5.1%
Industrials	16.6%	11.7%
Financial Services	14.1%	37.9%
Energy	5.9%	13.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	14.8%
Basic Materials	3.2%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.1%	4.9%
Communication Services	0.9%	0.9%
Utilities	0.3%	8.5%

Return for Risk

DWAS vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWAS

DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 65
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

XMVM

XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 92
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWAS vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWAS	XMVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.67	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	3.84	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.48	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	4.28	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	13.71	-4.07

DWAS vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and XMVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWAS	XMVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.16%	-62.83%	+16.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.10%	-9.18%	-5.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.83%	-24.12%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.83%	-24.12%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.16%	-45.07%	-1.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.64%	-0.12%	-9.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.24%	-10.19%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	2.86%	+1.19%

Volatility

DWAS vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWAS	XMVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	3.30%	+6.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.49%	9.25%	+11.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.73%	14.72%	+11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.95%	21.24%	+4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.85%	22.74%	+4.11%

DWAS vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWAS vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF	0.00%	0.07%	0.79%	1.42%	0.81%	0.16%	0.21%	0.13%	0.04%	0.20%	0.52%	0.19%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.78%	2.07%	1.43%	1.57%	1.76%	1.10%	1.37%	1.73%	2.87%	2.22%	2.27%	2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWAS and XMVM in my portfolio?

DWAS and XMVM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWAS or XMVM?

DWAS has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

Which ETF is better, DWAS or XMVM?

On 10-year performance, DWAS leads with 12.36% vs 12.28% for XMVM. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWAS or XMVM?

Over the 10-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWAS or XMVM?

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWAS or XMVM?

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

What is the main difference between DWAS and XMVM?

DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.39% for XMVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.