PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 12.36%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.58% annualized return.


DWAS

1D
2.36%
1M
-4.52%
6M
13.09%
YTD
18.89%
1Y
38.93%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
12.36%
ALL TIME*
11.83%

SPHQ

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.11%
6M
8.93%
YTD
14.14%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
14.58%
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.30M$3.37M$2.26M
$121.34M$134.31M$144.70M

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
18.89%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
14.14%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and SPHQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012

0.73

The correlation between DWAS and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
SPHQ

Healthcare

28.5%
3.2%

Technology

20.9%
41.2%

Industrials

16.6%
17.7%

Financial Services

14.1%
15.2%

Energy

5.9%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
5.3%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
7.5%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Communication Services

0.9%
6.4%

Utilities

0.3%
4.5%

Healthcare

DWAS
28.5%
SPHQ
3.2%

Technology

DWAS
20.9%
SPHQ
41.2%

Industrials

DWAS
16.6%
SPHQ
17.7%

Financial Services

DWAS
14.1%
SPHQ
15.2%

Energy

DWAS
5.9%
SPHQ
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
5.7%
SPHQ
5.3%

Basic Materials

DWAS
3.2%
SPHQ
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
2.9%
SPHQ
7.5%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.1%
SPHQ

-

Communication Services

DWAS
0.9%
SPHQ
6.4%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
SPHQ
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWASSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.45

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

8.64

+1.00

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-57.83%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-8.90%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-16.57%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-25.04%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-31.60%

-14.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.64%

-5.50%

-4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-10.64%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

2.52%

+1.53%

Volatility

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 4.77%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

4.77%

+4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

12.37%

+8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.73%

14.51%

+11.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.95%

16.74%

+9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

17.98%

+8.87%

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.10%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAS has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to SPHQ (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.58% vs 12.36% for DWAS. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while SPHQ is Quality Factor. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.15% for SPHQ.

DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer