DWAS vs. QQQM
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWAS returned 6.47%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for QQQM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
DWAS vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.64% return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAS vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 19.58% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 14.28% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.64% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and QQQM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DWAS and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWAS vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
QQQM
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
DWAS
QQQM
Technology
DWAS
QQQM
Industrials
DWAS
QQQM
Financial Services
DWAS
QQQM
Energy
DWAS
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
QQQM
Basic Materials
DWAS
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
QQQM
Real Estate
DWAS
QQQM
Communication Services
DWAS
QQQM
Utilities
DWAS
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
QQQM
DWAS vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.74 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.56 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.72 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 14.29 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.74 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.84 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.85 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -35.04% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -11.96% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -22.70% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -35.04% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | 0.00% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -8.26% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 3.11% | -0.05% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.47%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 4.47% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 12.06% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 15.92% | +6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 22.24% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 22.13% | +4.48% |
DWAS vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and QQQM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to QQQM (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.52% vs 6.47% for DWAS. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.52% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer