DWAS vs. MMTM
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds - DWAS tracks the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWAS returned 13.13%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for MMTM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.
Performance
DWAS vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 13.13%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
MMTM
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
DWAS vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 19.58% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 31.39% | -10.68% | 20.84% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 10.34% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and MMTM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012 | 0.64 |
The correlation between DWAS and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DWAS vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
MMTM
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
DWAS
MMTM
Technology
DWAS
MMTM
Industrials
DWAS
MMTM
Financial Services
DWAS
MMTM
Energy
DWAS
MMTM
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
MMTM
Basic Materials
DWAS
MMTM
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
MMTM
Real Estate
DWAS
MMTM
Communication Services
DWAS
MMTM
Utilities
DWAS
MMTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
MMTM
DWAS vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAS | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.87 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.59 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 2.72 | +1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 12.36 | +1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAS | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.87 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.77 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.81 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.85 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and MMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -33.85% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -9.89% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -22.08% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -23.72% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | -33.85% | -12.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.41% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -4.20% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.18% | +0.88% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.10%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 2.10% | +4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 10.69% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 14.14% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 18.20% | +7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 18.65% | +7.96% |
DWAS vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than MMTM's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and MMTM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to MMTM (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs MMTM's -33.85%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 15.13% vs 13.13% for DWAS. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.12% for MMTM.
MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and MMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer