PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 24.87% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 5.27% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 13.88%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.83% annualized return.


DWAS

1D
-1.80%
1M
6.39%
YTD
24.87%
6M
21.56%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
13.88%

MMTM

1D
-2.31%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
5.27%
6M
3.94%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
14.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAS vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
24.87%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
5.27%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and MMTM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.64

The correlation between DWAS and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWAS vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
MMTM

Healthcare

25.9%
10.7%

Technology

20.9%
32.3%

Industrials

18.0%
7.3%

Financial Services

13.3%
15.1%

Energy

6.5%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
12.1%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

1.1%
7.4%

Utilities

0.3%
2.4%

Healthcare

DWAS
25.9%
MMTM
10.7%

Technology

DWAS
20.9%
MMTM
32.3%

Industrials

DWAS
18.0%
MMTM
7.3%

Financial Services

DWAS
13.3%
MMTM
15.1%

Energy

DWAS
6.5%
MMTM
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
5.9%
MMTM
12.1%

Basic Materials

DWAS
3.9%
MMTM
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
3.0%
MMTM
6.2%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.2%
MMTM
3.0%

Communication Services

DWAS
1.1%
MMTM
7.4%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
MMTM
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAS vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWASMMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

1.93

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

8.42

+6.13

DWAS vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-33.85%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-9.89%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-22.08%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-23.72%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-33.85%

-12.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-4.99%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-4.19%

-6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.26%

+0.84%

Volatility

DWAS vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 4.15%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

4.15%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.12%

10.97%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.99%

14.57%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.86%

18.26%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.69%

18.66%

+8.03%

DWAS vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.88%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and MMTM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAS has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to MMTM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 14.83% vs 13.88% for DWAS. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.12% for MMTM.

DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer