PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. FYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. FYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DWAS having a 24.87% return and FYC slightly higher at 25.16%. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed FYC with an annualized return of 13.88%, while FYC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.10% annualized return.


DWAS

1D
-1.80%
1M
6.39%
YTD
24.87%
6M
21.56%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
13.88%

FYC

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.13%
YTD
25.16%
6M
22.15%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
28.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAS vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
24.87%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
25.16%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and FYC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012

0.93

The correlation between DWAS and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAS vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
FYC

Healthcare

25.9%
25.3%

Technology

20.9%
17.5%

Industrials

18.0%
18.7%

Financial Services

13.3%
8.9%

Energy

6.5%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
9.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

1.1%
3.7%

Utilities

0.3%
1.6%

Healthcare

DWAS
25.9%
FYC
25.3%

Technology

DWAS
20.9%
FYC
17.5%

Industrials

DWAS
18.0%
FYC
18.7%

Financial Services

DWAS
13.3%
FYC
8.9%

Energy

DWAS
6.5%
FYC
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
5.9%
FYC
9.5%

Basic Materials

DWAS
3.9%
FYC
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
3.0%
FYC
3.2%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.2%
FYC
5.7%

Communication Services

DWAS
1.1%
FYC
3.7%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
FYC
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAS vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWASFYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

5.44

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

19.70

-5.16

DWAS vs. FYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FYC Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and FYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, roughly equal to the maximum FYC drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and FYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASFYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-47.85%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-10.48%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-27.79%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-35.37%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-47.85%

+1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-0.75%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-9.63%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.89%

+0.21%

Volatility

DWAS vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) at 7.00%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASFYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

7.00%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.12%

15.77%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.99%

21.65%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.86%

23.73%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.69%

24.61%

+2.08%

DWAS vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison

DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.06%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DWAS and FYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DWAS has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to FYC (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs FYC's -47.85%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 15.10% vs 13.88% for DWAS. On fees, DWAS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWAS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

FYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while FYC is Small Cap Growth Equities. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.71% for FYC.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and FYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer