DWAS vs. FSMD
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWAS returned 6.53%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for FSMD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FSMD.
Performance
DWAS vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than FSMD's 15.44% return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 42.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
FSMD
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 15.44%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 26.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAS vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 20.65% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 11.70% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 15.44% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and FSMD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DWAS and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWAS vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
FSMD
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
DWAS
FSMD
Technology
DWAS
FSMD
Industrials
DWAS
FSMD
Financial Services
DWAS
FSMD
Energy
DWAS
FSMD
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
FSMD
Basic Materials
DWAS
FSMD
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
FSMD
Real Estate
DWAS
FSMD
Communication Services
DWAS
FSMD
Utilities
DWAS
FSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
FSMD
DWAS vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 3.16 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 11.37 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.75 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.53 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.56 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and FSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -40.67% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -8.44% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -22.16% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -22.16% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -6.00% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.34% | +0.72% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 4.13%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 4.13% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | 11.37% | +5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.84% | 15.25% | +7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 18.48% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.60% | 21.42% | +5.18% |
DWAS vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FSMD's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.20% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and FSMD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to FSMD (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs FSMD's -40.67%.
On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.77% vs 6.53% for DWAS. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.77% return vs 6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while FSMD is Small Cap Growth Equities. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.29% for FSMD.
DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and FSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer