PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than FSMD's 15.44% return.


DWAS

1D
1.49%
1M
1.30%
YTD
20.65%
6M
19.04%
1Y
42.75%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
13.13%

FSMD

1D
0.51%
1M
2.13%
YTD
15.44%
6M
15.12%
1Y
26.51%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAS vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
20.65%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%11.70%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
15.44%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and FSMD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.86

The correlation between DWAS and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAS vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
FSMD

Healthcare

28.2%
11.6%

Technology

18.6%
18.2%

Industrials

16.9%
20.7%

Financial Services

13.0%
15.4%

Energy

7.7%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
11.1%

Basic Materials

4.0%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
6.2%

Communication Services

1.1%
2.8%

Utilities

0.3%
2.2%

Healthcare

DWAS
28.2%
FSMD
11.6%

Technology

DWAS
18.6%
FSMD
18.2%

Industrials

DWAS
16.9%
FSMD
20.7%

Financial Services

DWAS
13.0%
FSMD
15.4%

Energy

DWAS
7.7%
FSMD
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
6.0%
FSMD
11.1%

Basic Materials

DWAS
4.0%
FSMD
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
3.1%
FSMD
3.3%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.1%
FSMD
6.2%

Communication Services

DWAS
1.1%
FSMD
2.8%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
FSMD
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAS vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWASFSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.16

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

11.37

+2.63

DWAS vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWASFSMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.75

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.53

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.06

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-40.67%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-8.44%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-22.16%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-22.16%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-6.00%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.34%

+0.72%

Volatility

DWAS vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 4.13%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

4.13%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

11.37%

+5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

15.25%

+7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

18.48%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

21.42%

+5.18%

DWAS vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FSMD's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.01%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.20%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and FSMD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAS has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to FSMD (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.77% vs 6.53% for DWAS. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.77% return vs 6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.

DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while FSMD is Small Cap Growth Equities. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.29% for FSMD.

DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer