DWAS vs. FMTM
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. DWAS is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. Over the past year, DWAS returned 41.87% vs 63.21% for FMTM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
DWAS vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.09% return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
FMTM
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 31.09%
- 6M
- 32.17%
- 1Y
- 63.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAS vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 19.58% | 20.89% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.09% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and FMTM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between DWAS and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
FMTM
DWAS vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAS | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.78 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.41 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 5.24 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 20.53 | -6.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAS | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.78 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 2.36 | -1.87 |
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -12.12% | -34.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -12.12% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | 0.00% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -1.89% | -8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 3.10% | -0.04% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) have volatilities of 6.77% and 6.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 6.52% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 17.88% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 22.82% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 22.98% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 22.98% | +3.63% |
DWAS vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FMTM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and FMTM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FMTM (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs FMTM's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.21% vs 41.87% for DWAS. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.21% return vs 41.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.45% for FMTM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer