PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVY vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVY vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Select Dividend ETF (DVY) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVY achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, DVY has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 10.13%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.


DVY

1D
-0.76%
1M
0.05%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.36%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
10.13%

FNDF

1D
-0.67%
1M
6.97%
YTD
21.21%
6M
24.72%
1Y
44.71%
3Y*
24.10%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVY vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVY
iShares Select Dividend ETF
9.70%11.60%16.24%1.12%1.80%31.70%-4.91%22.62%-6.36%14.82%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
21.21%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DVY and FNDF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.70

The correlation between DVY and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DVY vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DVY
FNDF

Financial Services

24.9%
16.7%

Utilities

24.2%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

13.5%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.7%

Energy

9.1%
12.3%

Communication Services

6.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.0%
5.5%

Technology

3.4%
11.1%

Basic Materials

2.3%
11.3%

Industrials

2.1%
15.9%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Financial Services

DVY
24.9%
FNDF
16.7%

Utilities

DVY
24.2%
FNDF
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

DVY
13.5%
FNDF
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DVY
9.4%
FNDF
10.7%

Energy

DVY
9.1%
FNDF
12.3%

Communication Services

DVY
6.0%
FNDF
4.9%

Healthcare

DVY
5.0%
FNDF
5.5%

Technology

DVY
3.4%
FNDF
11.1%

Basic Materials

DVY
2.3%
FNDF
11.3%

Industrials

DVY
2.1%
FNDF
15.9%

Real Estate

DVY

-

FNDF
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVY vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVY
DVY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVY vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Select Dividend ETF (DVY) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVYFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.53

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

4.24

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

16.19

-5.36

DVY vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVY and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVYFNDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.99

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.83

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.68

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.54

-0.06

Drawdowns

DVY vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVY drawdown since its inception was -62.59%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVY and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVYFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.59%

-40.14%

-22.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-10.60%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-13.89%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

-25.56%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-40.14%

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.67%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-7.64%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.77%

-0.82%

Volatility

DVY vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Select Dividend ETF (DVY) is 2.79%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that DVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVYFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

5.26%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

12.53%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

15.06%

-3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

16.18%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

17.67%

+0.34%

DVY vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVY vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

DVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVY
iShares Select Dividend ETF
3.41%3.65%3.65%3.82%3.43%3.12%3.66%3.41%3.58%3.00%3.04%3.45%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.84%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVY and FNDF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to DVY (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVY dropped -62.59% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.93% vs 10.13% for DVY. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DVY has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DVY.

DVY has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.84% for FNDF.

DVY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DVY tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DVY and 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVY and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer