DVXK vs. GINN
DVXK (WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DVXK tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVXK charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.
Performance
DVXK vs. GINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXK achieves a 39.88% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 9.62% return.
DVXK
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 23.10%
- YTD
- 39.88%
- 6M
- 36.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GINN
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DVXK vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF | 39.88% | 15.77% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 9.62% | 6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXK and GINN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXK vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank
DVXK
GINN
DVXK vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXK | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 0.46 | +1.86 |
Drawdowns
DVXK vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXK drawdown since its inception was -24.08%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXK and GINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXK | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.08% | -41.25% | +17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -0.74% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -13.36% | +6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.64% | — |
Volatility
DVXK vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXK | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.26% | 16.06% | +16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.26% | 21.32% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.26% | 21.04% | +11.22% |
DVXK vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXK has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXK vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison
DVXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than GINN's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF | 2.37% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.15% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXK and GINN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXK.
DVXK has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.15% for GINN.
DVXK tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXK and 0.50% for GINN.
Find the right allocation for DVXK and GINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer