PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVXK vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVXK vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXK achieves a 39.88% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 9.62% return.


DVXK

1D
-2.01%
1M
23.10%
YTD
39.88%
6M
36.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GINN

1D
0.91%
1M
5.65%
YTD
9.62%
6M
8.49%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVXK vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DVXK and GINN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVXK vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVXK

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVXK vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DVXK vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVXKGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

0.46

+1.86

Drawdowns

DVXK vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXK drawdown since its inception was -24.08%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXK and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVXKGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.08%

-41.25%

+17.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-0.74%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-13.36%

+6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

Volatility

DVXK vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVXKGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.26%

16.06%

+16.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.26%

21.32%

+10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.26%

21.04%

+11.22%

DVXK vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVXK has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVXK vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

DVXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than GINN's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DVXK
WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF
2.37%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVXK and GINN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXK.

DVXK has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.15% for GINN.

DVXK tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXK and 0.50% for GINN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVXK and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer