DVXF vs. XLF
DVXF (WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - DVXF tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index while XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DVXF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
DVXF vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXF achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 4.51% return.
DVXF
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 8.88%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
DVXF vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | 5.86% | 5.63% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.51% | 4.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXF and XLF is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXF vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
DVXF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLF
DVXF vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXF | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXF vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXF drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXF and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXF | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.68% | -82.69% | +56.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -19.95% | +10.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.81% | — |
Volatility
DVXF vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXF | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.94% | 14.64% | +13.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 18.52% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 22.06% | +5.88% |
DVXF vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXF vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
DVXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.42% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, DVXF and XLF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXF.
XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for DVXF.
DVXF tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXF and 0.08% for XLF.
Find the right allocation for DVXF and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer