DVXC vs. GOLS
DVXC (WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF) and GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. DVXC is passively managed, while GOLS is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVXC charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GOLS.
Performance
DVXC vs. GOLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DVXC
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- -14.49%
- YTD
- -21.18%
- 6M
- -19.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLS
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVXC vs. GOLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DVXC WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF | -21.18% |
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXC and GOLS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXC vs. GOLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF (DVXC) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXC vs. GOLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXC drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, which is greater than GOLS's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXC and GOLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXC | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.16% | -7.85% | -16.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.16% | -3.99% | -20.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -1.94% | -5.53% |
Volatility
DVXC vs. GOLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXC | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.75% | 13.79% | +12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.75% | 13.79% | +12.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.75% | 13.79% | +12.96% |
DVXC vs. GOLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLS's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXC vs. GOLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither DVXC nor GOLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXC and GOLS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DVXC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DVXC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
DVXC and GOLS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXC and 0.90% for GOLS.
Find the right allocation for DVXC and GOLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer