DVXB vs. XLB
DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Materials funds - DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index while XLB tracks the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
DVXB vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 14.35% return.
DVXB
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
DVXB vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 20.01% | -6.27% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 14.35% | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXB and XLB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXB vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
DVXB
XLB
DVXB vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXB | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.36 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
DVXB vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXB | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -59.83% | +40.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.08% | -3.28% | -5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -10.84% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility
DVXB vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXB | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.44% | 16.78% | +13.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 18.94% | +11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 20.65% | +9.79% |
DVXB vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXB vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, DVXB and XLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.13% for XLB.
Find the right allocation for DVXB and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer