PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVQQ vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVQQ achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return.


DVQQ

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.35%
YTD
17.26%
6M
15.36%
1Y
46.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ENFR

1D
1.01%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
23.07%
6M
24.76%
1Y
24.84%
3Y*
28.26%
5Y*
19.69%
10Y*
11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DVQQ
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF
17.26%18.03%-7.84%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
23.07%5.88%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DVQQ and ENFR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024

0.07

The correlation between DVQQ and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVQQ vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVQQ
DVQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DVQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DVQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVQQENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.89

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

7.40

+0.93

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVQQ and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVQQ drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVQQ and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVQQENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.28%

-68.28%

+43.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.89%

-8.64%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-6.12%

+2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-15.94%

+8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

3.36%

+2.20%

Volatility

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.42%. This indicates that DVQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVQQENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

5.42%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.81%

11.57%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

14.82%

+9.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.92%

19.24%

+5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

24.68%

+0.24%

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVQQ has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVQQ vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

DVQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than ENFR's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVQQ
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.08%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVQQ and ENFR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVQQ has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to ENFR (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVQQ dropped -25.28% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 1-year performance, DVQQ leads with 46.21% vs 24.84% for ENFR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DVQQ has performed better with a 46.21% return vs 24.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DVQQ.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.03% for DVQQ.

DVQQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. DVQQ tracks Syntax Defined Volatility Triple Qs Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for DVQQ and 0.35% for ENFR.

DVQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVQQ and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer