DVOL vs. ULVM
DVOL (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - DVOL tracks the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DVOL returned 6.89%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for ULVM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVOL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
DVOL vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVOL achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.99% return.
DVOL
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
DVOL vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 1.20% | 4.30% | 24.84% | 5.39% | -16.10% | 30.08% | 11.15% | 26.10% | -9.89% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.99% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVOL and ULVM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between DVOL and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
DVOL vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DVOL
ULVM
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
DVOL
ULVM
Industrials
DVOL
ULVM
Energy
DVOL
ULVM
Real Estate
DVOL
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
DVOL
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
DVOL
ULVM
Basic Materials
DVOL
ULVM
Technology
DVOL
ULVM
Healthcare
DVOL
ULVM
Communication Services
DVOL
ULVM
Utilities
DVOL
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVOL vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
DVOL
ULVM
DVOL vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVOL | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 2.80 | -2.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.11 | 3.92 | -3.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.49 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 4.64 | -4.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 19.27 | -19.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVOL | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 2.80 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.75 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
DVOL vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVOL drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, smaller than the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVOL and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVOL | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.26% | -40.71% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -6.47% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.66% | -18.14% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -19.77% | -4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | 0.00% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -5.75% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 1.56% | +1.35% |
Volatility
DVOL vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) is 2.87%, while VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that DVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVOL | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.13% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 8.03% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 10.74% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 15.48% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 18.86% | -1.13% |
DVOL vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVOL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVOL vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
DVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than ULVM's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 0.69% | 0.86% | 0.67% | 1.28% | 1.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 1.79% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVOL and ULVM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULVM has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to DVOL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVOL dropped -38.26% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.59% vs 6.89% for DVOL. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.69% for DVOL.
DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DVOL and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVOL and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer