DVND vs. GCOW
DVND (Touchstone Dividend Select ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DVND is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DVND returned 16.99%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for GCOW. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVND charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
DVND vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVND achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.25% return.
DVND
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 27.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
DVND vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVND Touchstone Dividend Select ETF | 10.56% | 16.36% | 11.57% | 14.04% | 1.22% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.25% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVND and GCOW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between DVND and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DVND vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DVND
GCOW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DVND
GCOW
Financial Services
DVND
GCOW
-
Healthcare
DVND
GCOW
Industrials
DVND
GCOW
Communication Services
DVND
GCOW
Consumer Defensive
DVND
GCOW
Consumer Cyclical
DVND
GCOW
Energy
DVND
GCOW
Basic Materials
DVND
GCOW
Utilities
DVND
GCOW
Real Estate
DVND
GCOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVND vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
DVND
GCOW
DVND vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVND | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 5.80 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.77 | 15.21 | -3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVND | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.56 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.59 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
DVND vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVND drawdown since its inception was -14.83%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVND and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVND | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -37.64% | +22.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -4.77% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.64% | -12.35% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.67% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -5.84% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.81% | +0.25% |
Volatility
DVND vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) is 2.50%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that DVND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVND | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 2.75% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 7.99% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.82% | 10.80% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 13.48% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 16.20% | -2.84% |
DVND vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVND has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVND vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
DVND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than GCOW's 5.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVND Touchstone Dividend Select ETF | 1.80% | 1.93% | 2.06% | 2.05% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 5.39% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVND and GCOW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCOW has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to DVND (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVND dropped -14.83% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 3-year performance, GCOW leads with 17.57% vs 16.99% for DVND. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DVND has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 17.57% return vs 16.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DVND.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 1.80% for DVND.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DVND and 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVND and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer