DVND vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DVND (Touchstone Dividend Select ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DVND is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DVND returned 15.85%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for GCOW. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVND charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

DVND vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVND achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 7.36% return.

DVND

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 8.30%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 7.11%
• 1Y: 22.04%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVND vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DVND Touchstone Dividend Select ETF	9.30%	16.36%	11.57%	14.04%	1.22%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	7.36%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DVND and GCOW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2022	0.68

The correlation between DVND and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DVND vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DVND	GCOW
Technology	27.0%	1.3%
Financial Services	13.9%	-
Healthcare	11.5%	14.8%
Industrials	9.2%	12.6%
Communication Services	8.9%	14.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	17.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	4.8%
Energy	4.6%	22.9%
Basic Materials	4.3%	8.1%
Utilities	3.1%	4.0%
Real Estate	2.6%	-

Return for Risk

DVND vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVND

DVND Risk / Return Rank: 64
DVND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
DVND Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DVND Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DVND Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
DVND Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 70
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVND vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVND	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.00	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	2.86	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	2.99	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	10.37	-1.09

DVND vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVND Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVND and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVND vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVND drawdown since its inception was -14.83%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVND and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVND	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.83%	-37.64%	+22.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-7.40%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.64%	-12.35%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-6.91%	+5.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-5.83%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	2.13%	-0.05%

Volatility

DVND vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.99%. This indicates that DVND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVND	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.22%	2.99%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.66%	8.32%	-0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	11.11%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.33%	13.51%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.33%	16.03%	-2.70%

DVND vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVND has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVND vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

DVND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than GCOW's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DVND Touchstone Dividend Select ETF	1.82%	1.93%	2.06%	2.05%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.90%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVND and GCOW in my portfolio?

DVND and GCOW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVND or GCOW?

DVND has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to GCOW (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVND dropped -14.83% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which ETF is better, DVND or GCOW?

On 3-year performance, DVND leads with 15.85% vs 15.31% for GCOW. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVND or GCOW?

Over the 3-year period, DVND has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 15.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVND or GCOW?

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DVND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVND or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 1.82% for DVND.

What is the main difference between DVND and GCOW?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DVND and 0.60% for GCOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.