DVGR vs. PWV
DVGR (DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF) and PWV (Invesco Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DVGR is actively managed, while PWV is passively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DVGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PWV.
Performance
DVGR vs. PWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVGR achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 21.58% return.
DVGR
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PWV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 18.00%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 1Y
- 33.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.57%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $154.80K | $105.54K | $58.19K | |
| $10.04M | $7.39M | $4.81M |
DVGR vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF | 9.35% | -0.69% |
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 21.58% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVGR and PWV is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVGR vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank
DVGR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PWV
DVGR vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVGR | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.60 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVGR vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVGR drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVGR and PWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVGR | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -49.04% | +40.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.90% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -9.43% | +7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility
DVGR vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVGR | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 9.69% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 14.28% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 17.14% | -4.31% |
DVGR vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PWV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVGR vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison
DVGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PWV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVGR and PWV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DVGR.
PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.60% for DVGR.
They also come from different issuers: DAC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DVGR and 0.55% for PWV.
Find the right allocation for DVGR and PWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer