DVGR vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DVGR (DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DVGR is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

DVGR vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVGR achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 7.34% return.

DVGR

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 6M: 6.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -6.00%
• YTD: 7.34%
• 6M: 7.96%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 11.84%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVGR vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF	6.56%	-0.69%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	7.34%	1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DVGR and GCOW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

DVGR vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVGR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 59
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVGR vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVGR	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.04	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.58	—

Drawdowns

DVGR vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVGR drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVGR and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVGR	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-37.64%	+29.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-6.93%	+4.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-5.83%	+4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DVGR	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	11.11%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	13.50%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	16.17%	-2.65%

DVGR vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVGR vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

DVGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than GCOW's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF	0.49%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.90%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVGR and GCOW in my portfolio?

DVGR and GCOW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DVGR or GCOW?

On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVGR or GCOW?

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DVGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVGR or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.49% for DVGR.

What is the main difference between DVGR and GCOW?

They also come from different issuers: Dividend Assets Capital and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DVGR and 0.60% for GCOW.