DVDN vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DVDN (Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVDN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Kingsbarn, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. DVDN is actively managed, while IGF is passively managed. Over the past year, DVDN returned -16.64% vs 15.30% for IGF. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVDN charges 1.72%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

DVDN vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVDN achieves a -10.16% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 8.05% return.

DVDN

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: -6.27%
• YTD: -10.16%
• 6M: -15.05%
• 1Y: -16.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVDN vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DVDN Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF	-10.16%	-17.23%	2.17%	14.96%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	8.05%	21.31%	14.81%	9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DVDN and IGF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023	0.46

DVDN vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DVDN	IGF
Real Estate	79.5%	0.1%
Financial Services	20.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	20.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	38.8%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	41.1%

Return for Risk

DVDN vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVDN

DVDN Risk / Return Rank: 3
DVDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DVDN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 44
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVDN vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DVDN	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.95	1.47	-2.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.24	2.10	-3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.26	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	2.62	-3.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	8.05	-9.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DVDN vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVDN and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DVDN	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.95	1.47	-2.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.27	0.24	-0.51

Drawdowns

DVDN vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVDN drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVDN and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVDN	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-58.33%	+23.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.34%	-5.87%	-19.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.07%	-4.43%	-27.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-11.87%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.29%	1.90%	+11.39%

Volatility

DVDN vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.68%. This indicates that DVDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVDN	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	3.68%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.35%	8.59%	+5.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.76%	10.49%	+7.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.83%	13.99%	+4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	16.83%	+2.00%

DVDN vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVDN has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVDN vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

DVDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.84%, more than IGF's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVDN Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF	14.84%	17.27%	14.43%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.98%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVDN and IGF in my portfolio?

DVDN and IGF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVDN or IGF?

DVDN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to IGF (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVDN dropped -34.59% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, DVDN or IGF?

On 1-year performance, IGF leads with 15.30% vs -16.64% for DVDN. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVDN or IGF?

Over the 1-year period, IGF has performed better with a 15.30% return vs -16.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVDN or IGF?

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.72% for DVDN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVDN or IGF?

DVDN has the higher dividend yield at 14.84%, compared with 2.98% for IGF.

What is the main difference between DVDN and IGF?

DVDN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kingsbarn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.72% for DVDN and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.