DUST vs. OOQB
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. DUST is passively managed, while OOQB is actively managed. Over the past year, DUST returned -76.81% vs -27.35% for OOQB. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.
Performance
DUST vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -26.71% return, which is significantly lower than OOQB's -18.43% return.
DUST
- 1D
- 6.82%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -26.71%
- 6M
- -36.80%
- 1Y
- -76.81%
- 3Y*
- -62.09%
- 5Y*
- -47.20%
- 10Y*
- -53.65%
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.99%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUST vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -26.71% | -82.86% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -18.43% | -13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and OOQB is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
OOQB
DUST vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUST | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.94 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.51 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -0.91 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUST | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | -0.53 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | -0.41 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
DUST vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and OOQB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -53.44% | -46.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.15% | -53.44% | -32.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -43.69% | -56.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.35% | -23.26% | -60.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.85% | 30.11% | +32.74% |
Volatility
DUST vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 30.34% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.34% | 0.00% | +30.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.12% | 39.39% | +32.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.34% | 51.57% | +38.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 58.12% | +14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.19% | 58.12% | +29.07% |
DUST vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, less than OOQB's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 8.90% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and OOQB have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (30.34%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUST dropped -100.00% vs OOQB's -53.44%.
On 1-year performance, OOQB leads with -27.35% vs -76.81% for DUST. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OOQB has performed better with a -27.35% return vs -76.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUST.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 8.90% for DUST.
DUST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 0.75% for OOQB.
OOQB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUST and OOQB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer