DUSB vs. DFAU
DUSB (Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUSB returned 4.31% vs 28.49% for DFAU. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUSB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.
Performance
DUSB vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSB achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than DFAU's 11.32% return.
DUSB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DUSB vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF | 1.68% | 4.53% | 5.60% | 1.79% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 11.32% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 11.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSB and DFAU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUSB vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank
DUSB
DFAU
DUSB vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUSB | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +20.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.87 | 1.43 | +3.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 55.00 | 3.30 | +51.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 332.80 | 15.10 | +317.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUSB | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.10 | 2.38 | +7.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.88 | 0.94 | +8.94 |
Drawdowns
DUSB vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.29%, smaller than the maximum DFAU drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSB and DFAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSB | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -23.61% | +23.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -8.67% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.67% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -4.99% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 1.89% | -1.88% |
Volatility
DUSB vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) is 0.13%, while Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that DUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUSB | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | 2.95% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.30% | 9.04% | -8.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43% | 12.06% | -11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.52% | 17.02% | -16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.52% | 16.73% | -16.21% |
DUSB vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DUSB vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison
DUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than DFAU's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF | 4.06% | 4.32% | 4.92% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUSB and DFAU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAU has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to DUSB (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUSB dropped -0.29% vs DFAU's -23.61%.
On 1-year performance, DFAU leads with 28.49% vs 4.31% for DUSB. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 28.49% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for DUSB.
DUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.
DUSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DFAU is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DUSB and 0.12% for DFAU.
DUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.10 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUSB and DFAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer