DUSB vs. PULS
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS).
DUSB and PULS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DUSB is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. PULS is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DUSB or PULS.
Correlation
The correlation between DUSB and PULS is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DUSB vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DUSB:
7.88
PULS:
12.29
DUSB:
11.73
PULS:
29.22
DUSB:
4.09
PULS:
7.95
DUSB:
14.61
PULS:
58.50
DUSB:
128.08
PULS:
370.99
DUSB:
0.04%
PULS:
0.02%
DUSB:
0.66%
PULS:
0.48%
DUSB:
-0.35%
PULS:
-5.85%
DUSB:
-0.30%
PULS:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSB achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 0.69% return.
DUSB
0.33%
0.07%
2.26%
5.17%
N/A
N/A
PULS
0.69%
0.40%
2.77%
5.84%
3.22%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DUSB vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DUSB and PULS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DUSB vs. PULS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DUSB
PULS
DUSB vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DUSB vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
DUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than PULS's 5.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF | 4.57% | 4.92% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.51% | 5.63% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.92% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
DUSB vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.35%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSB and PULS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DUSB vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.09%. This indicates that DUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.