DUSA vs. GXLC
DUSA (Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DUSA is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUSA charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
DUSA vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSA achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 10.46% return.
DUSA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 10.81%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 24.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUSA vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF | 12.63% | 6.71% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 10.46% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSA and GXLC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUSA vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank
DUSA
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DUSA vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUSA | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUSA vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSA drawdown since its inception was -36.71%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSA and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSA | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.71% | -9.08% | -27.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.12% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -1.55% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility
DUSA vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUSA | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 13.60% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 13.60% | +4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 13.60% | +6.17% |
DUSA vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSA has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUSA vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
DUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than GXLC's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF | 0.85% | 0.96% | 0.85% | 3.38% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 0.51% | 1.12% | 2.77% | 0.68% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.63% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUSA and GXLC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for DUSA.
DUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.63% for GXLC.
They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for DUSA and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for DUSA and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer