DURA vs. VTI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DURA tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DURA returned 7.64%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for VTI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

DURA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 15.02% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.20% return.

DURA

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: 1.59%
• 6M: 10.84%
• YTD: 15.02%
• 1Y: 19.77%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: —

VTI

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 8.99%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 1Y: 22.02%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: 14.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURA vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	15.02%	7.61%	8.51%	0.82%	2.41%	15.53%	0.04%	27.55%	-3.77%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	11.20%	17.10%	23.81%	26.05%	-19.52%	25.68%	21.08%	30.67%	-6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DURA and VTI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between DURA and VTI has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DURA vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DURA	VTI
Consumer Defensive	22.1%	4.3%
Healthcare	14.3%	9.0%
Energy	13.8%	3.3%
Technology	11.2%	37.0%
Financial Services	9.0%	11.3%
Communication Services	8.8%	9.8%
Utilities	6.6%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	9.7%
Industrials	6.0%	9.4%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.9%
Real Estate	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

DURA vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURA

DURA Risk / Return Rank: 56
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 66
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DURA	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.72	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.38	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.48	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	10.85	-1.78

DURA vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURA and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DURA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DURA	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.15%	-55.45%	+22.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-8.92%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-19.30%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.80%	-25.36%	+9.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.73%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-8.00%	+4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.03%	+0.15%

Volatility

DURA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.38%. This indicates that DURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DURA	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	3.38%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	10.13%	-1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	12.82%	+2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.67%	17.51%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.92%	18.28%	-1.36%

DURA vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

DURA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than VTI's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	3.16%	3.59%	3.33%	3.58%	3.01%	2.89%	3.49%	3.83%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.05%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DURA and VTI in my portfolio?

DURA and VTI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DURA or VTI?

DURA has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VTI (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, DURA or VTI?

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.32% vs 7.64% for DURA. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DURA or VTI?

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DURA or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DURA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DURA or VTI?

DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 1.05% for VTI.

What is the main difference between DURA and VTI?

DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.