PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DURA vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DURA vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return.


DURA

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
12.23%
6M
12.16%
1Y
20.37%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
-4.48%
1M
8.74%
YTD
32.00%
6M
29.92%
1Y
41.78%
3Y*
33.87%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
17.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURA vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
12.23%7.61%8.51%0.82%2.41%15.53%0.04%27.55%-3.77%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
32.00%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DURA and MTUM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between DURA and MTUM has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DURA vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DURA
MTUM

Consumer Defensive

22.1%
3.7%

Healthcare

14.3%
3.5%

Energy

13.8%
10.5%

Technology

11.2%
50.2%

Financial Services

9.0%
5.0%

Communication Services

8.8%
5.1%

Utilities

6.6%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
2.9%

Industrials

6.0%
15.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.3%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

DURA
22.1%
MTUM
3.7%

Healthcare

DURA
14.3%
MTUM
3.5%

Energy

DURA
13.8%
MTUM
10.5%

Technology

DURA
11.2%
MTUM
50.2%

Financial Services

DURA
9.0%
MTUM
5.0%

Communication Services

DURA
8.8%
MTUM
5.1%

Utilities

DURA
6.6%
MTUM
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DURA
6.3%
MTUM
2.9%

Industrials

DURA
6.0%
MTUM
15.0%

Basic Materials

DURA
1.9%
MTUM
2.3%

Real Estate

DURA

-

MTUM
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DURA vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURA
DURA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURA vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DURAMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.64

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

13.91

-4.19

DURA vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURA Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURA and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DURA vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DURAMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-34.08%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.53%

-11.54%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-20.99%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.80%

-32.28%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-4.48%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-6.19%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.01%

-0.91%

Volatility

DURA vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) is 3.22%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that DURA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DURAMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

12.20%

-8.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

19.44%

-11.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

21.93%

-7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

21.15%

-7.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

21.31%

-4.36%

DURA vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DURA vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than MTUM's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
3.31%3.59%3.33%3.58%3.01%2.89%3.49%3.83%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DURA and MTUM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to DURA (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.18% vs 7.63% for DURA. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DURA has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DURA.

DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

DURA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DURA and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer