DURA vs. FTIF
DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DURA tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index while FTIF tracks the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DURA returned 9.89%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for FTIF. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
DURA vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 15.95% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 24.04% return.
DURA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
FTIF
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- YTD
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.16K | $85.30K | $69.37K | |
| $126.29K | $72.10K | $61.82K |
DURA vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 15.95% | 7.61% | 8.51% | 5.99% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 24.04% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and FTIF is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between DURA and FTIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
DURA vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DURA
FTIF
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Financial Services
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
DURA
FTIF
-
Healthcare
DURA
FTIF
-
Energy
DURA
FTIF
Financial Services
DURA
FTIF
-
Technology
DURA
FTIF
Communication Services
DURA
FTIF
-
Utilities
DURA
FTIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
DURA
FTIF
Industrials
DURA
FTIF
Basic Materials
DURA
FTIF
Real Estate
DURA
-
FTIF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DURA vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
DURA
FTIF
DURA vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DURA | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 4.88 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | 14.19 | -4.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DURA vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than FTIF's maximum drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURA | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -27.83% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -6.34% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -27.83% | +13.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -1.90% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -5.90% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.20% | -0.06% |
Volatility
DURA vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 2.73%. This indicates that DURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DURA | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 2.73% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 10.51% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 15.04% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 18.73% | -5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 18.73% | -1.84% |
DURA vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DURA vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than FTIF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.13% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.08% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DURA and FTIF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DURA has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to FTIF (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 3-year performance, FTIF leads with 10.74% vs 9.89% for DURA. On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.08% for FTIF.
DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DURA and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer