DUKX vs. PATN
DUKX (Ocean Park International ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DUKX is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. Over the past year, DUKX returned 27.12% vs 73.16% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUKX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.
Performance
DUKX vs. PATN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUKX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 40.52% return.
DUKX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PATN
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 16.77%
- YTD
- 40.52%
- 6M
- 44.04%
- 1Y
- 73.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUKX vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKX Ocean Park International ETF | 10.68% | 11.07% | -3.32% |
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 40.52% | 40.01% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUKX and PATN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DUKX and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
DUKX vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUKX
PATN
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DUKX
PATN
Technology
DUKX
PATN
Industrials
DUKX
PATN
Basic Materials
DUKX
PATN
Consumer Cyclical
DUKX
PATN
Healthcare
DUKX
PATN
Communication Services
DUKX
PATN
Consumer Defensive
DUKX
PATN
Energy
DUKX
PATN
Utilities
DUKX
PATN
-
Real Estate
DUKX
PATN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUKX vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank
DUKX
PATN
DUKX vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUKX | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 3.47 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 4.35 | -1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.60 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 5.11 | -2.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 20.70 | -12.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUKX | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 3.47 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 2.28 | -1.61 |
Drawdowns
DUKX vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUKX drawdown since its inception was -19.52%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKX and PATN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUKX | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.52% | -16.77% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -14.40% | +4.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -0.39% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -3.15% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.55% | -0.13% |
Volatility
DUKX vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) is 5.54%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that DUKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUKX | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 8.84% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 18.16% | -7.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 21.18% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 20.85% | -6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 20.85% | -6.70% |
DUKX vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUKX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUKX vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison
DUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than PATN's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKX Ocean Park International ETF | 2.24% | 2.65% | 1.93% |
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 1.60% | 2.25% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUKX and PATN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATN has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to DUKX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKX dropped -19.52% vs PATN's -16.77%.
On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 73.16% vs 27.12% for DUKX. On fees, PATN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DUKX has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 73.16% return vs 27.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PATN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKX.
DUKX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.60% for PATN.
They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for DUKX and 0.65% for PATN.
PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUKX and PATN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer