PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUKX vs. DUKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than DUKQ's 13.40% return.


DUKX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.88%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.12%
1Y
28.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DUKQ

1D
0.08%
1M
2.89%
YTD
13.40%
6M
12.21%
1Y
27.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUKX
Ocean Park International ETF
12.39%11.07%-3.50%
DUKQ
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
13.40%5.69%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKX and DUKQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.70

The correlation between DUKX and DUKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUKX
DUKQ

Technology

22.7%
34.8%

Financial Services

22.0%
9.3%

Industrials

13.0%
10.9%

Basic Materials

8.6%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

5.7%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.8%

Communication Services

5.1%
7.7%

Energy

4.1%
3.7%

Utilities

3.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.1%

Technology

DUKX
22.7%
DUKQ
34.8%

Financial Services

DUKX
22.0%
DUKQ
9.3%

Industrials

DUKX
13.0%
DUKQ
10.9%

Basic Materials

DUKX
8.6%
DUKQ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DUKX
8.1%
DUKQ
10.3%

Healthcare

DUKX
5.7%
DUKQ
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

DUKX
5.1%
DUKQ
4.8%

Communication Services

DUKX
5.1%
DUKQ
7.7%

Energy

DUKX
4.1%
DUKQ
3.7%

Utilities

DUKX
3.0%
DUKQ
3.7%

Real Estate

DUKX
2.8%
DUKQ
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUKX vs. DUKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKX
DUKX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DUKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DUKQ
DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUKXDUKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.51

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

14.40

-6.13

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the DUKQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKX and DUKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKX drawdown since its inception was -19.52%, which is greater than DUKQ's maximum drawdown of -18.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKX and DUKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUKXDUKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.52%

-18.44%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-7.84%

-1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.44%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-3.84%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.91%

+1.59%

Volatility

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Volatility Comparison

Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) at 5.19%. This indicates that DUKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUKXDUKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

5.19%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

10.24%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

13.15%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

14.99%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

14.99%

-0.40%

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DUKQ's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUKX vs. DUKQ - Dividend Comparison

DUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than DUKQ's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DUKQ
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
0.66%0.68%0.28%
DUKX
Ocean Park International ETF
2.21%2.65%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUKX and DUKQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUKX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to DUKQ (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKX dropped -19.52% vs DUKQ's -18.44%.

On 1-year performance, DUKX leads with 28.85% vs 27.38% for DUKQ. On fees, DUKQ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, DUKQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUKX has performed better with a 28.85% return vs 27.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUKQ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKX.

DUKX has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.66% for DUKQ.

DUKX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DUKQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for DUKX and 0.98% for DUKQ.

DUKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUKX and DUKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer