DUKX vs. EIS
DUKX (Ocean Park International ETF) and EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DUKX is actively managed, while EIS is passively managed. Over the past year, DUKX returned 27.12% vs 54.91% for EIS. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUKX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EIS.
Performance
DUKX vs. EIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUKX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than EIS's 18.19% return.
DUKX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIS
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 54.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
DUKX vs. EIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKX Ocean Park International ETF | 10.68% | 11.07% | -3.54% |
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 18.19% | 45.11% | 20.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUKX and EIS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between DUKX and EIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
DUKX vs. EIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUKX
EIS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DUKX
EIS
Technology
DUKX
EIS
Industrials
DUKX
EIS
Basic Materials
DUKX
EIS
Consumer Cyclical
DUKX
EIS
Healthcare
DUKX
EIS
Communication Services
DUKX
EIS
Consumer Defensive
DUKX
EIS
Energy
DUKX
EIS
Utilities
DUKX
EIS
Real Estate
DUKX
EIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUKX vs. EIS — Risk / Return Rank
DUKX
EIS
DUKX vs. EIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) and iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUKX | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.45 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 3.36 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 4.45 | -1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 16.54 | -8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUKX | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.45 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.33 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
DUKX vs. EIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUKX drawdown since its inception was -19.52%, smaller than the maximum EIS drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKX and EIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUKX | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.52% | -51.94% | +32.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -12.40% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -5.56% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -13.90% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.33% | +0.09% |
Volatility
DUKX vs. EIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) is 5.54%, while iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that DUKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUKX | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 6.64% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 16.05% | -5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 22.56% | -9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 21.81% | -7.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 21.08% | -6.93% |
DUKX vs. EIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUKX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EIS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUKX vs. EIS - Dividend Comparison
DUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than EIS's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUKX Ocean Park International ETF | 2.24% | 2.65% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUKX and EIS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIS has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to DUKX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKX dropped -19.52% vs EIS's -51.94%.
On 1-year performance, EIS leads with 54.91% vs 27.12% for DUKX. On fees, EIS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DUKX has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EIS has performed better with a 54.91% return vs 27.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKX.
DUKX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.22% for EIS.
They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for DUKX and 0.59% for EIS.
EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUKX and EIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer