DUKQ vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DUKQ (Ocean Park Domestic ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DUKQ is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past year, DUKQ returned 24.76% vs 0.08% for DFND. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUKQ charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

DUKQ vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DUKQ

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 11.76%
• 1Y: 24.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.08%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKQ vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	12.18%	5.69%	4.80%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKQ and DFND is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	0.12

DUKQ vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUKQ	DFND
Technology	30.1%	24.8%
Industrials	11.5%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	3.5%
Financial Services	10.3%	18.2%
Healthcare	8.6%	10.7%
Communication Services	8.0%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	4.2%
Energy	4.9%	1.7%
Utilities	4.1%	-
Real Estate	3.3%	2.0%
Basic Materials	2.9%	4.3%

Return for Risk

DUKQ vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKQ

DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 67
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKQ vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUKQ	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	0.19	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	0.35	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.05	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	0.60	+2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	1.08	+11.96

DUKQ vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKQ and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUKQ vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKQ drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKQ and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUKQ	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.44%	-22.65%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-3.44%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-3.69%	+2.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-5.70%	+1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	3.72%	-1.81%

Volatility

DUKQ vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that DUKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUKQ	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	0.00%	+5.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.09%	6.10%	+3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.02%	10.88%	+2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.96%	22.44%	-7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	19.08%	-4.12%

DUKQ vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUKQ vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

DUKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	0.67%	0.68%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUKQ and DFND in my portfolio?

DUKQ and DFND have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUKQ or DFND?

DUKQ has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKQ dropped -18.44% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, DUKQ or DFND?

On 1-year performance, DUKQ leads with 24.76% vs 0.08% for DFND. On fees, DUKQ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUKQ or DFND?

Over the 1-year period, DUKQ has performed better with a 24.76% return vs 0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUKQ or DFND?

DUKQ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUKQ or DFND?

DUKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between DUKQ and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for DUKQ and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DUKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.