PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUKQ vs. DUKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKQ achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than DUKX's 12.39% return.


DUKQ

1D
0.08%
1M
2.89%
YTD
13.40%
6M
12.21%
1Y
27.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DUKX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.88%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.12%
1Y
28.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUKQ
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
13.40%5.69%4.80%
DUKX
Ocean Park International ETF
12.39%11.07%-3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKQ and DUKX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.70

The correlation between DUKQ and DUKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUKQ
DUKX

Technology

34.8%
22.7%

Industrials

10.9%
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
8.1%

Financial Services

9.3%
22.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
5.7%

Communication Services

7.7%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.1%

Energy

3.7%
4.1%

Utilities

3.7%
3.0%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
8.6%

Technology

DUKQ
34.8%
DUKX
22.7%

Industrials

DUKQ
10.9%
DUKX
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DUKQ
10.3%
DUKX
8.1%

Financial Services

DUKQ
9.3%
DUKX
22.0%

Healthcare

DUKQ
8.9%
DUKX
5.7%

Communication Services

DUKQ
7.7%
DUKX
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

DUKQ
4.8%
DUKX
5.1%

Energy

DUKQ
3.7%
DUKX
4.1%

Utilities

DUKQ
3.7%
DUKX
3.0%

Real Estate

DUKQ
3.1%
DUKX
2.8%

Basic Materials

DUKQ
2.7%
DUKX
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUKQ vs. DUKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKQ
DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DUKX
DUKX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DUKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUKQDUKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.06

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

8.27

+6.13

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the DUKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKQ and DUKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKQ drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, smaller than the maximum DUKX drawdown of -19.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKQ and DUKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUKQDUKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.44%

-19.52%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-9.48%

+1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.39%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-5.40%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.50%

-1.59%

Volatility

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) is 5.19%, while Ocean Park International ETF (DUKX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that DUKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUKQDUKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

6.51%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

12.36%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

14.54%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

14.59%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

14.59%

+0.40%

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUKQ vs. DUKX - Dividend Comparison

DUKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than DUKX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DUKQ
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
0.66%0.68%0.28%
DUKX
Ocean Park International ETF
2.21%2.65%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUKQ and DUKX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUKX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to DUKQ (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKQ dropped -18.44% vs DUKX's -19.52%.

On 1-year performance, DUKX leads with 28.85% vs 27.38% for DUKQ. On fees, DUKQ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, DUKQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUKX has performed better with a 28.85% return vs 27.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUKQ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKX.

DUKX has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.66% for DUKQ.

DUKQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DUKX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for DUKQ and 1.03% for DUKX.

DUKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUKQ and DUKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer