DUHP vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DUHP (Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUHP returned 16.06%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DUHP charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

DUHP vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 10.93% return.

DUHP

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: 7.04%
• YTD: 8.79%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: 16.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.05%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	$29.95M	$29.57M	$35.23M
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M

DUHP vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	8.79%	13.77%	19.49%	21.11%	-0.03%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and TDVG is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.92

The correlation between DUHP and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUHP	TDVG
Technology	37.0%	27.4%
Industrials	15.8%	14.4%
Healthcare	13.0%	12.8%
Financial Services	9.1%	19.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	6.6%
Communication Services	5.6%	0.8%
Energy	2.0%	4.5%
Utilities	1.0%	3.2%
Basic Materials	0.7%	2.8%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

DUHP vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 53
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 61

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUHP vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUHP	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.87	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.69	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.34	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	2.51	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	10.48	-3.22

DUHP vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, roughly equal to the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUHP	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-19.20%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-7.24%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.86%	-14.02%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-0.92%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-3.67%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.73%	+0.37%

Volatility

DUHP vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that DUHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUHP	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	2.20%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	7.30%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	9.74%	+2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	13.87%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.19%	13.81%	+2.38%

DUHP vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUHP vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	0.93%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUHP and TDVG in my portfolio?

DUHP and TDVG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUHP or TDVG?

DUHP has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, DUHP or TDVG?

On 3-year performance, DUHP leads with 16.06% vs 14.55% for TDVG. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUHP or TDVG?

Over the 3-year period, DUHP has performed better with a 16.06% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUHP or TDVG?

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUHP or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.93% for DUHP.

What is the main difference between DUHP and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.