PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUHP vs. QUAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUHP vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DUHP having a 9.06% return and QUAL slightly lower at 8.80%.


DUHP

1D
-0.41%
1M
6.00%
YTD
9.06%
6M
9.28%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
10Y*

QUAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.80%
6M
8.86%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
9.06%13.77%19.49%21.11%-2.56%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
8.80%12.65%22.29%30.88%-8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and QUAL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.96

The correlation between DUHP and QUAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUHP
QUAL

Technology

34.0%
36.5%

Industrials

15.5%
8.2%

Healthcare

13.0%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
9.3%

Financial Services

9.4%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

6.7%
11.1%

Energy

2.3%
4.0%

Utilities

1.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

DUHP
34.0%
QUAL
36.5%

Industrials

DUHP
15.5%
QUAL
8.2%

Healthcare

DUHP
13.0%
QUAL
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DUHP
9.5%
QUAL
9.3%

Financial Services

DUHP
9.4%
QUAL
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

DUHP
7.9%
QUAL
4.9%

Communication Services

DUHP
6.7%
QUAL
11.1%

Energy

DUHP
2.3%
QUAL
4.0%

Utilities

DUHP
1.0%
QUAL
1.9%

Basic Materials

DUHP
0.6%
QUAL
1.7%

Real Estate

DUHP

-

QUAL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUHP vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUHPQUALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

1.84

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

2.62

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.41

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.95

11.00

-1.05

DUHP vs. QUAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the QUAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and QUAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUHPQUALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.84

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.80

+0.07

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and QUAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUHPQUALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-34.06%

+14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-9.03%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-18.00%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.16%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-4.11%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.98%

+0.07%

Volatility

DUHP vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUHPQUALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.51%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

9.03%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

11.83%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.33%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

18.10%

-1.86%

DUHP vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DUHP vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than QUAL's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.97%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.88%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DUHP and QUAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DUHP has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to QUAL (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs QUAL's -34.06%.

On 3-year performance, QUAL leads with 19.66% vs 19.22% for DUHP. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 19.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DUHP.

DUHP has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.88% for QUAL.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.15% for QUAL.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUHP and QUAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer