DUG vs. QLD
DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - DUG tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DUG returned -32.74%/yr vs 32.56%/yr for QLD. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DUG vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -47.25% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 18.94% return. Over the past 10 years, DUG has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -32.74%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 32.56% annualized return.
DUG
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -20.41%
- 6M
- -30.77%
- YTD
- -47.25%
- 1Y
- -52.73%
- 3Y*
- -25.03%
- 5Y*
- -40.83%
- 10Y*
- -32.74%
- ALL TIME*
- -30.09%
QLD
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 32.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.33M | $1.11M | $2.13M | |
| $408.78M | $399.91M | $439.78M |
DUG vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | -47.25% | -18.63% | -6.13% | -2.28% | -72.98% | -68.12% | -24.59% | -23.47% | 36.14% | -1.09% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 18.94% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUG and QLD is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.44 |
The correlation between DUG and QLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DUG vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUG
QLD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DUG
QLD
Basic Materials
DUG
-
QLD
Communication Services
DUG
-
QLD
Consumer Cyclical
DUG
-
QLD
Consumer Defensive
DUG
-
QLD
Energy
DUG
-
QLD
Healthcare
DUG
-
QLD
Industrials
DUG
-
QLD
Real Estate
DUG
-
QLD
Technology
DUG
-
QLD
Utilities
DUG
-
QLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUG vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
DUG
QLD
DUG vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.18 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.46 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 4.32 | -5.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUG vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -83.13% | -16.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.00% | -25.13% | -31.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.94% | -42.29% | -23.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.03% | -63.68% | -30.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.46% | -63.68% | -35.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -16.72% | -83.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.04% | -18.11% | -70.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.55% | 8.47% | +27.08% |
Volatility
DUG vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) is 12.01%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that DUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 13.69% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.36% | 31.99% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.16% | 38.62% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 45.76% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 44.97% | +13.82% |
DUG vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DUG and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DUG vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than QLD's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | 4.54% | 3.21% | 5.66% | 4.16% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.56% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUG and QLD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to DUG (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 32.56% vs -32.74% for DUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DUG has been the lower-risk option at 12.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 32.56% return vs -32.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUG and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.14% for QLD.
DUG tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUG and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer