DUBS vs. QQA
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUBS returned 27.76% vs 22.30% for QQA. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
DUBS vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than QQA's 10.71% return.
DUBS
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.96%
QQA
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $881.48K | $1.25M | $931.41K | |
| $6.83M | $6.98M | $6.86M |
DUBS vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 13.77% | 19.28% | 4.68% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 10.71% | 17.24% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and QQA is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DUBS and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DUBS vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUBS
QQA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DUBS
QQA
Financial Services
DUBS
QQA
Communication Services
DUBS
QQA
Consumer Cyclical
DUBS
QQA
Healthcare
DUBS
QQA
Industrials
DUBS
QQA
Consumer Defensive
DUBS
QQA
Energy
DUBS
QQA
Utilities
DUBS
QQA
Real Estate
DUBS
QQA
Basic Materials
DUBS
QQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
QQA
DUBS vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUBS | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.26 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 2.56 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | 9.38 | +5.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -19.73% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -8.76% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.57% | +3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -2.57% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.38% | -0.46% |
Volatility
DUBS vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) is 3.96%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that DUBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 5.83% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 12.69% | -1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 15.26% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 18.67% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 18.67% | -4.03% |
DUBS vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than QQA's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 1.97% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 10.00% | 9.78% | 4.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DUBS and QQA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQA has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to DUBS (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs QQA's -19.73%.
On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 27.76% vs 22.30% for QQA. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 27.76% return vs 22.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DUBS.
QQA has the higher dividend yield at 10.00%, compared with 1.97% for DUBS.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.29% for QQA.
DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer