PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 45.35% return.


DUBS

1D
0.34%
1M
5.12%
YTD
13.00%
6M
13.09%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNAV

1D
-1.30%
1M
15.60%
YTD
45.35%
6M
44.98%
1Y
69.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUBS vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
13.00%19.28%3.45%
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
45.35%16.80%6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and CNAV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.76

The correlation between DUBS and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUBS vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUBSCNAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

5.40

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.74

23.12

-4.38

DUBS vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUBSCNAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.79

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.57

-0.05

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSCNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-30.06%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-12.97%

+4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.30%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-5.41%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

3.03%

-1.29%

Volatility

DUBS vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) is 2.69%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.10%. This indicates that DUBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSCNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

12.10%

-9.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

21.09%

-11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

25.12%

-12.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

27.15%

-12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.54%

27.15%

-12.61%

DUBS vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.93%2.06%2.52%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUBS and CNAV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNAV has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to DUBS (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 69.75% vs 32.48% for DUBS. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 69.75% return vs 32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 1.31% for CNAV.

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer