DTH vs. CXSE
DTH (WisdomTree International High Dividend Fund) and CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DTH is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree International High Dividend Index, while CXSE is a China Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DTH returned 9.50%/yr vs 7.47%/yr for CXSE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DTH charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CXSE.
Performance
DTH vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTH achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than CXSE's -2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DTH has outperformed CXSE with an annualized return of 9.50%, while CXSE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.47% annualized return.
DTH
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
CXSE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -4.37%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- -8.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
DTH vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTH WisdomTree International High Dividend Fund | 9.75% | 42.37% | 2.31% | 15.03% | -1.74% | 8.30% | -7.05% | 18.43% | -12.85% | 21.10% |
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -2.88% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -18.02% | -29.32% | -23.67% | 59.39% | 37.96% | -28.55% | 81.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTH and CXSE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012 | 0.48 |
DTH vs. CXSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTH
CXSE
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
DTH
CXSE
Industrials
DTH
CXSE
Utilities
DTH
CXSE
Energy
DTH
CXSE
Consumer Defensive
DTH
CXSE
Basic Materials
DTH
CXSE
Communication Services
DTH
CXSE
Real Estate
DTH
CXSE
Consumer Cyclical
DTH
CXSE
Healthcare
DTH
CXSE
Technology
DTH
CXSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTH vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank
DTH
CXSE
DTH vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International High Dividend Fund (DTH) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTH | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.13 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 0.80 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 1.63 | +8.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTH vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTH drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, smaller than the maximum CXSE drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTH and CXSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTH | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -70.01% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -17.70% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.23% | -32.12% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.40% | -64.47% | +41.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.75% | -70.01% | +29.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -48.04% | +46.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.14% | -27.86% | +12.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 8.70% | -6.17% |
Volatility
DTH vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree International High Dividend Fund (DTH) is 4.33%, while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that DTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTH | CXSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 7.13% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 15.04% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.04% | 21.64% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 32.33% | -17.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 28.69% | -11.64% |
DTH vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTH has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTH vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison
DTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than CXSE's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 2.06% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
DTH WisdomTree International High Dividend Fund | 3.39% | 3.80% | 5.41% | 5.63% | 5.70% | 4.72% | 3.75% | 4.27% | 4.62% | 3.72% | 4.14% | 4.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTH and CXSE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXSE has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to DTH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTH dropped -64.20% vs CXSE's -70.01%.
On 10-year performance, DTH leads with 9.50% vs 7.47% for CXSE. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DTH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DTH has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DTH.
DTH has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.06% for CXSE.
DTH is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CXSE is China Equities. DTH tracks WisdomTree International High Dividend Index, while CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DTH and 0.32% for CXSE.
DTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTH and CXSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer